On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:39:08 -0700
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Here's the proposal again.  If there's an issue with it, shoot it
> down, but from here, it certainly seems to fit the bill.  Again,
> I'd /love/ to say I was the one that came up with it, but I wasn't.
> =8^)
> 
> * give [AH]Ts a <name>[EMAIL PROTECTED] address.
> 
> - It's not a subdomain, so the existing infrastructure should have no
> problems with it.
> 
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED] remains distinctive enough it should
> alleviate any doubts or confusion over status.
> 
> - the biggest possible objection I can see is that the root,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], is already in use.  Thus, in particular, I'd like
> to see his reaction to this proposal.  We could, of course, take the
> same idea and change the root, if necessary.  My previous suggestion,
> intern, would work, or assistant, or something else.  Tester is of
> course short and concise, but intern or assistant would be more
> generic, allowing the possiblity of other non-tester additions, in
> the future, with the same root.

Has the same problem as a subdomain as it creates two "classes" of
devs. So it would solve the potential technical problems, but we still
have the semantic issues.

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to