Kurt Lieber posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:28:35 +0000:
> This solution has the same yellow star stigma that the original proposal > does. Agreed, altho it seems that's the way the council wanted it... > The only outstanding administrative issue is how these aliases are > managed. The same management issues exist regardless of whether we're > talking about [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then I missunderstood. The infra objections I'D read appeared (to me) to be to the subdomain, as it wasn't an issue with the original GLEP. However, I now see the original GLEP's proposal of addresses vs. the new GLEP's proposal of aliases is a valid rendering of the objections as well, and indeed, as you so patiently explain, this doesn't affect that aspect. Being infra, that pretty absolutely quashes my previous understanding, and with it, the proposed solution. Thanks for making it clear to me. Shot down, indeed, but that's exactly what I asked for! =8^) Too bad it wasn't that simple! -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
