Homer Parker wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 17:01 -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
>
>>This sounds good to me as well, very professional. How easy is it
>>going
>>to be to change to a normal @g.o address? As simple as a forward? For
>>instance, if someone who is an AT decides to become a full dev.
>
>
> That's what the GLEP says will happen ;)
>
:redfaced:
Sorry, I read the glep initially when it was first posted but I forgot
that detail.
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:01:34 -0500 Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| This sounds good to me as well, very professional.
The problem with staff is that staff who aren't ATs/HTs won't be using
it...
I agree with this. Those of us who don't have commit rights to the tree
should have an @staff.g.o, people like me for instance. I happen to be
part of two projects but neither gives me access to the tree so I would
get an @staff.g.o and am fine with that. It lets people I email outside
of the project know that I am staff and not a developer.
Maybe a new GLEP is in order? It makes sense to do it now since infra is
going to be setting up alias' anyway. While we're at it possibly an
@dev.g.o as well (as someone mentioned)? That way there is no confusion.
If anyone wants to pursue this we should start a new thread to keep the
issues seperate.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
