On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:21:42PM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > if you read this whole thread you'll find that it is a grey area with > > different devrel people saying/thinking different things in terms of what > > devrel's responsibilities are > > It sounds like somebody needs to take a look at all of the existing > documentation for this topic, write a GLEP that clarifies the matter, > and present it to the council for a vote. > > - - who should enforce Gentoo policy (technical or otherwise)? > - - what are the procedures for getting the enforcement done? > - - what checks and balances are in place (and are more/clarification > needed)? > - - etc. >
Sounds to me more like people who aren't familiar with the internal structure of Gentoo don't need to be the peanut gallery when it comes to internal structural issues, but that's just me 8) As far as devrel goes, call me a traditionalist but I think while infra should be able to do emergency deactivations (and afaik nobody's ever said they shouldn't) devrel should continue to be responsible for disciplinary issues including repeated QA violations reported by the QA team -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
