Jon Portnoy wrote: > Sounds to me more like people who aren't familiar with the internal > structure of Gentoo don't need to be the peanut gallery when it comes to > internal structural issues, but that's just me 8)
It sounds to me like those 'more familiar with the internal structure Gentoo' haven't done so well on this issue. Maybe a little *more* peanut gallery would do some good. 8) Seriously, don't knock an idea simply because it doesn't come from somebody in your chosen circle, or because it comes from somebody you don't like personally... > As far as devrel goes, call me a traditionalist but I think while infra > should be able to do emergency deactivations (and afaik nobody's ever > said they shouldn't) devrel should continue to be responsible for > disciplinary issues including repeated QA violations reported by the QA > team What about giving QA temporary revoke powers just like infra (Curtis Napier's idea), traditionalist? Fixing devrel's resolutions policies and Curtis' idea don't have to be mutually-exclusive. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
