On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:03:31 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Could we get GLEP 31 (Character Sets for Portage Tree Items) added? | > The only issue holding it back is that a few developers have stated | > outright that they refuse to comply with it, and I don't see it as | > fair to make other developers suffer nasty repoman errors because | > of things a select few will end up breaking... | | it was approved once already, just retracted after that fact pending | further developments in terms of application/developer support | (editors not sucking so much for example) ... so does it really need | to be approved again ?
What I mean is... Is the council prepared to commit itself to helping with enforcement of the GLEP? Adding repoman enforcement would be trivial, but repoman is circumventable -- the GLEP is withdrawn because several developers have said that they'll do just that anyway. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpbx8BoNf8z8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
