Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2005 06:34 pm, Jim Northrup wrote: > >>of course bb is a space-saver, but i find myself turning the room upside >>down for full-static versions of tar, nc and fileutils > > > bb is static and it supports tar, nc, and many fileutils ;) > -mike
If only a little crippled in functionality compared to their full equivalents... :-) Although for what BusyBox is... it's a great tool. -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Stuart Longland -oOo- http://stuartl.longlandclan.hopto.org | | Atomic Linux Project -oOo- http://atomicl.berlios.de | | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | | I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on a tape somewhere | +-------------------------------------------------------------+
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
