Hi Justin: Thank you for your prompt reply, I understand. And there is one more question for help:
- NOTICE is missing information from other Apache licensed NOTICE files. Information from these NOTICE files [5][6][7][10] will need to be added. We did it in the way of [6] [10]. What is the relationship between [5] [7] and [6] [10]? When do you use the former mode to declare, and when do you use the concise mode? Thanks! Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 于2021年1月28日周四 上午11:46写道: > Hi, > > > 1. If the referenced file source has the original version statement, we > should keep it as it is and cannot replace it with the Apache v2 statement? > > Correct. > > > 2. If the referenced file source does not have a version statement, but > the project of the file has a version statement, do we copy the license > statement of the project to the file header? > > I would just leave the file as it is. > > > 3. Do we still need to indicate which project the source of the document > comes from? > > such as[9]: > > /** > > * Utility for .ini configure file loading. > > * Copied from <a href="https://github.com/killme2008/Metamorphosis < > https://github.com/killme2008/Metamorphosis>">Metamorphosis Project</a> > > */ > > It best to mentioner that in LICENSE, but I see no harm in adding that. > > Thanks, > Justin