Thanks to the three of you. Those arguments make sense to me and we indeed have a few "newcomers" with us (that includes me in a non-committer role) so I've changed my opinion and think the Incubator way would be the best.
I'll edit the Wiki proposal (and add Christofer whom I've forgotten, sorry!) to indicate this. If there are no other comments or concerns about anything we've written in the proposal I would "close" this discussion soon and start a vote early next week. Cheers, Lars (as a heads up: I might be slow to respond next week due to limited connectivity but we're in no rush as far as I'm concerned) On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:53 AM Myrle Krantz <my...@apache.org> wrote: > My initial thought was: this should go straight to TLP: Training should be > done by people who know what they're training about: whether it be the > Apache Way or a specific project. All the committers will likely be people > who've at least reached committer status in a project, and most of them > will probably be ASF members. > > But then I thought again: developing effective materials will require > contact to the users of those materials. What better place to find people > to QA training materials and approaches than in the incubator? I think a > training project would benefit from incubator participation in a different > manner than most projects do, but I do think starting in the incubator (and > possibly, after discussion, even staying there) might be a good approach > for this project. > > Best Regards, > Myrle > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:34 AM Sönke Liebau > <soenke.lie...@opencore.com.invalid> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > after spending some time thinking about this I also tend towards the > > Incubator route as I am sure this will help build and grow an active > > community and processes. > > > > Best regards, > > Sönke > > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:38 AM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > discussion seems to have died down. Before moving on I'd really like > to > > > > hear the opinions of the interested contributors on which direction > to > > go. > > > > Otherwise we might have to put it to a vote? > > > > > > Perhaps I biased, but I think going via the incubator is alway helpful. > > :-) The big question is would the board support the project going > straight > > to TLP? I really don’t know, it’s approved them in the past and not > > rejected any that I know of. What could the project do to show the board > > that going straight to TLP is justifiable? Perhaps start by list out how > > many ASF members you have on the project and and give an idea of how long > > they been around, how many projects they gone through incubation with and > > how active they are in the incubator and may help you decide which path > to > > go and give the board some reassurance. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Justin > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sönke Liebau > > Partner > > Tel. +49 179 7940878 > > OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
