Hi Chris,

thanks for chiming in and your offer!

The setup you describe sounds pretty much exactly what we envisioned
when we started looking at infrastructure around trainings - back then
I think it just sort of died down for a mixture of reasons like too
much effort for just the few trainings we had and a lack of "the
perfect technology". I remember looking at reveal.js also couldn't
tell you why we discarded it back then to be honest, but I suspect it
may well have been due to lack of understanding.
Regarding the "plugin architecture" we ended up with something that
sounds very similar, we have a few plugins that generate images out of
things like websequencediagram or draw.io code and then a macro that
updates images in the Powerpoint slides to the generated version, so
to me these two things sound very aligned.

So in short, we'd of course immensely appreciate a donation of your work!

Best regards,
Sönke

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:35 AM Christofer Dutz
<christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> finally having some time to read through the proposal, I too would be 
> interested in participating.
>
> I do have quite a bit of experience in creating trainings as this is part of 
> my job at codecentric.
> For the ASF I have for example prepared a Maven training, which I held in 
> Vancouver a few years ago.
>
> Justin pointed me to having a look as maybe my presentation-setup could be 
> helpful as well.
> Most presentations are in a binary format (or in an XML format that's so 
> complex, I'd call it XML-binary)
> So a typical git workflow is sort of pointless.
>
> For the last few years I have been doing all my talks, trainings etc. in a 
> setup I have been perfecting.
> I am writing content as Asciidoc files and have them generated to slides via 
> RevealJS via Maven.
>
> My setup currently supports a huge variety of plugins that allow all sorts of 
> charts, diagrams, or other content.
>
> The main benefit for me is that this way I can always tag, branch and compare 
> versions of my talks.
>
> Guess it could be helpful in community built content and reviews.
>
> So if you are interested in this, I would be happy to donate that ... as well 
> as my existing training material.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Am 04.02.19, 10:21 schrieb "Lars Francke" <lars.fran...@gmail.com>:
>
>     Dmitry, Kenneth,
>
>     sorry for the slow replies. I was offline on vacation for a few days. I'll
>     add both of you to the Wiki (if you haven't already done so).
>
>     I love that we have gathered quite a few interested people to participate
>     already but I'd love to hear more (or any really) opinions on the proposal
>     itself as well as the route it should go.
>
>     I'm now leaning in favor of straight-to-TLP. I know we don't have any 
> fixed
>     duration for DISCUSS threads and discussion has died down but I don't
>     really want to close it yet so I'll wait at least until the end of the 
> week
>     before starting any potential next steps.
>
>     > I'm not a professional teacher or trainer, but I have been a part of
>     preparing and delivering a number of trainings and talks  (also the usual
>     teaching, tutoring, talking in grad school FWIW) and I love it.
>
>     I assume (haven't checked) that this is the background of most of us. It
>     certainly is mine as well. So that should not be a problem at all!
>
>     Cheers,
>     Lars
>
>     On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:22 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     > Hi Lars,
>     >
>     > I would like to be a part of this too, according to your & the others' 
> best
>     > judgment. I'm PMC at Beam & incubator.
>
>     One of my favorite things about Beam that keeps
>     > me working on it is that it is a natural integration point of lots of
>     > different Apache projects both as data processing engines (Spark, Flink,
>     > Apex, Samza, Tez, Storm, incubating Nemo, ex-incubating Gearpump, ...) 
> used
>     > by Beam users and also data stores (Cassandra, HBase, Hadoop, Tika, 
> Hive,
>     > ...) they want to read/write from. So our trainings are already 
> basically
>     > cross-project Apache-focused material and it would be great
>     > cross-pollination. We often have to help users configure their Spark &
>     > Flink clusters, etc.
>     >
>     > Kenn
>     >
>     > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 2:04 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org> 
> wrote:
>     >
>     > > Hi Lars,
>     > >
>     > > I'd like to be a part of this. I'm PMC at Apache Ignite. Sometimes I 
> need
>     > > to give individual feedback to developers related to both Apache 
> policies
>     > > and spirit of developing software in a community way. Why not invest
>     > effort
>     > > into training and education materials instead?
>     > >
>     > > I gave several talks in Russia related to The Apache Software 
> Foundation
>     > > and
>     > > blog about The Apache Way. I also assist newcomers joining Apache 
> Ignite.
>     > > So count on my support, and I definitely would like to became 
> committer
>     > at
>     > > Training.
>     > >
>     > > Sincerely,
>     > > Dmitriy Pavlov
>     > >
>     > > ср, 30 янв. 2019 г. в 01:25, Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com>:
>     > >
>     > > > Craig,
>     > > >
>     > > > that's great news. Thank you for volunteering. I've added you to the
>     > > Wiki.
>     > > >
>     > > > Cheers,
>     > > > Lars
>     > > >
>     > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:01 PM Craig Russell 
> <apache....@gmail.com>
>     > > > wrote:
>     > > >
>     > > > > Hi Lars,
>     > > > >
>     > > > > I'll volunteer to mentor the project if it ends up incubating. And
>     > I'd
>     > > > > like to join the discussion as a member of the (P)PMC. The idea 
> of an
>     > > > open
>     > > > > source project to help rationalize training materials is very
>     > > appealing.
>     > > > >
>     > > > > I'm also very interested in the ecosystem of not-for-profit 
> education
>     > > and
>     > > > > I think this project would be a great fit.
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Craig
>     > > > >
>     > > > > > On Jan 28, 2019, at 5:49 AM, Lars Francke 
> <lars.fran...@gmail.com>
>     > > > > wrote:
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > I've been going back and forth on the topic of TLP vs. Incubator
>     > > > podling.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > I don't really have a strong opinion but I'm leaning slightly in
>     > > favor
>     > > > of
>     > > > > > "straight to TLP" and the past discussion (linked in previous 
> mail)
>     > > did
>     > > > > > also have more voices in favor of TLP. But of course there are
>     > > > arguments
>     > > > > to
>     > > > > > be made for both sides.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > I've been wondering if anyone here has opinions on this part of 
> the
>     > > > > > proposal?
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > In a related thread I asked about how to proceed in terms of
>     > choosing
>     > > > > > members for a PMC and one suggestion was to make it depend on 
> the
>     > > > route:
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > * Incubator: On graduation ask and assess current PMC members 
> and
>     > see
>     > > > if
>     > > > > > everyone has proven their merit and is willing to continue
>     > > > > > * TLP: Start with a PMC consisting of only ASF members (plus
>     > > additional
>     > > > > > committers) and then accept additional members for the PMC on a
>     > > > "normal"
>     > > > > > basis
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > Cheers,
>     > > > > > Lars
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 1:49 PM Lars Francke <
>     > lars.fran...@gmail.com
>     > > >
>     > > > > wrote:
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > >> Hello everyone,
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> this is the result of the discussion I started in December
>     > 2018[1].
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> I would like to start this thread to get feedback on a proposal
>     > > we've
>     > > > > been
>     > > > > >> working on for a project focused on developing training 
> material
>     > for
>     > > > > Apache
>     > > > > >> & 3rd party projects.
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> The full proposal can be found here <
>     > > > > >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TrainingProposal>
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> Disclaimer: It is a bit different than most other proposals as 
> it
>     > > > > >> basically starts at zero.
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> Our main goals for this discussion are:
>     > > > > >> * Finding mentors and interested contributors
>     > > > > >> * Discuss whether this should be a Incubator project, straight 
> to
>     > > TLP
>     > > > > or a
>     > > > > >> Central Service
>     > > > > >> * Sharpen the scope of the project
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> While I personally have a relatively long history as a
>     > contributor,
>     > > > > >> committer etc. at Apache I've never been a mentor before so we
>     > would
>     > > > > love
>     > > > > >> for some experienced people to help us out.
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> We're looking forward to all kinds of feedback.
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> Cheers,
>     > > > > >> Lars
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> [1] <
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     > 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cb4d7eef73e0d526e0124944c3d37325aa892675351a1eed0a25de3@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>     > > > > >>>
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Craig L Russell
>     > > > > c...@apache.org
>     > > > >
>     > > > >
>     > > > > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>     > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>     > > > >
>     > > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>
>


-- 
Sönke Liebau
Partner
Tel. +49 179 7940878
OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to