On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 7:39 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:37 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > I'll point out that Ranger graduated the incubator with a less than > stellar > > release history. [1] is a good example of such problems > > > > Oozie predates me. > > > > But to answer the original question, no, the requirements shouldn't be > any > > less stringent on WAR files vs other packages, its a closed package that > is > > hard to look at and needs to indicate everything within it. While both > of > > these projects were incubating, they are no longer incubating and you > > should follow up with them directly if you want them to fix their > licensing. > > I do -- but that gets me back to my original question -- what example > can I give them? > > Seriously -- at this point -- I'm about to go to Maven central and > search for org.apache.* > artifacts with war as packaging and see what comes up in terms of > recent releases. > > However, if somebody can spare me this agony -- I'd appreciate it ;-) > > I believe Fineract would be a good example. I don't think they're on maven central, but you can download them - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/fineract/0.6.0-incubating/apache-fineract-0.6.0-incubating-binary.tar.gz NOTICE/LICENSE in the root of the distribution + the WAR file (in WEB-INF). > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
