I don't have any examples, but I don't know of any webapps that don't bundle dependencies otherwise users are forced to install all the dependencies by hand into tomcat/common or something. Whether they dependencies are ASF compatible or not I don't know, but from the peanut gallery that sounds completely normal.
Tom On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi! > > I advising a podling on producing a binary release that > includes a Java web app (think war file). I wanted to give > them a taste of what TLPs do so I went to the ones that > I knew were generating war files: Oozie and Ranger. > You know the stuff I'm familiar with in Hadoop ecosystem. > > What he discovered may shock you! No, but seriously. > > Here's what these projects publish on Maven central: > > https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/ > apache/oozie/oozie-webapp/4.3.0/oozie-webapp-4.3.0.war > https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/ > apache/ranger/security-admin-web/0.7.0/security-admin-web-0.7.0.war > > Each of these WAR files: > 1. bundles all sorts of dependancies -- not just the bits coming > from the project itself > > 2. Neither provides a meanigful LICENSE nor NOTICE files. > The ones under ./WEB-INF/classes/META-INF are stock ones > and really don't address the binary dependencies bundling > > Have we somehow relaxed the requirements for binary artifacts? > I hope not -- and if not -- what are the good examples of web app > projects doing it right? > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Tom Barber CTO Spicule LTD t...@spicule.co.uk http://spicule.co.uk @spiculeim <http://twitter.com/spiculeim> Schedule a meeting with me <http://meetme.so/spicule> GB: +44(0)5603641316 US: +18448141689 <https://leanpub.com/juju-cookbook>
