I'll point out that Ranger graduated the incubator with a less than stellar release history. [1] is a good example of such problems
Oozie predates me. But to answer the original question, no, the requirements shouldn't be any less stringent on WAR files vs other packages, its a closed package that is hard to look at and needs to indicate everything within it. While both of these projects were incubating, they are no longer incubating and you should follow up with them directly if you want them to fix their licensing. [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2dda0fef19673055482574d6d7350273bb6db55026ab9f10b4cf461c@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:26 PM P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 26, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > > > > But that's actually not important -- you're right bundling > > dependencies is OK, but > > doing that makes it even more important to do proper LICENSE and NOTICE. > > IMO, you hit the nail on the head right there. I would hope the war file > would contain both and they reflect the dependencies contained in the war > file (as opposed to the official source distribution, which may not). > > -Taylor > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
