On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:53 PM Craig Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > On Oct 29, 2016, at 1:54 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >>> -1 due to the kinesis library issue. > >> > >> Can you provide a bit more detail on what the objection is with the > >> kinesis library? Given it's optional and not being distributed I thought > >> this would cover it? [1] > >> > > > > I obviously have a different take than you. I'm more worried about the > > derived works aspect of the license as it stands. > > What part of the release is a “derived work”? > I consider the library to be the derived work (I know on the JIRA there's some discussion over that). I'm still a bit lost on how Cat X licenses can be included as dependencies, seems to go against https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-x > > Craig > > > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Justin > >> > >> 1. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
