More on DEPENDENCIES:

The latest version of Apache's maven-parent explicitly excludes it from the
RAT check. [0] I see other projects have the same file e,g,. [1]. See also
the linked issues from the Apache pom [2].

I think that file's presence may be WAI?

[0] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/maven-
parent-27/pom.xml?revision=1704199&view=markup#l1029
[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/isis/isis-
core/isis-1.13.0-source-release.zip
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-184

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Thanks Justin.
>
> Anyway I will double check the Kinesis client dependency definition.
>
> Thanks again
> Regards
> JB
>
> ⁣​
>
> On Oct 29, 2016, 08:18, at 08:18, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Changing my vote to +1 (binding).
> >
> >> Not sure I understand. If the dependency is optional and scope
> >provided, I don't think it's an issue.
> >
> >In the legal JIRA and the discussion on the dev list there's no nothing
> >about if the dependancy is considered optional or not that I could
> >find.
> >
> >This of course may be obvious to people working on the project but not
> >to people outside the project - so sorry about that. :-)
> >
> >> Kinesis IO will be used by a very small part of users imho (only the
> >ones who needs pipelines connected with Kinesis).
> >
> >If that’s the case then IMO there no issue with the dependancy.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Justin
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

Reply via email to