On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:20 AM Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A RESULT can still be given when the vote is cancelled. To my mind, the > major purpose of the CANCEL is to shorten the vote period so that the next > vote on the next iteration of the release candidate can start immediately > without confusion. > > Fair enough. When reading it, my first inclination was that it looked like it passed. I still think it would be better if we made there was something saying the vote did not pass. John > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Craig Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > Given the state of Apache documented processes, I think it was perfectly > > fine to close this vote with a RESULT. I was not confused after reading > > > > >>> We will correct the noted problems and submit a 0.8.1-RC4. > > > > Recognizing that this document is (still!) in draft status > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#note-votes > > > > "It is conventional to end a VOTE thread with a RESULT post tallying the > > votes cast. To preserve the thread, this should be done by replying to > the > > original VOTE post and adding a [RESULT] prefix. The subject may be > > retained as is or edited to indicate the result." > > > > I have seen both positive and negative vote results announced as results. > > > > If we expect folks to follow the proposed rule “Usually when a vote does > > not pass, the person initiating the vote sends out a [CANCEL] rather > than a > > [RESULT] (result inherently is treated as a "it passed" email).” we > should > > publish this rule somewhere. > > > > Regards, > > > > Craig > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 2016, at 4:38 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > ASF votes don't complete in 72 hours unless the required binding votes > > are > > > placed. In this case you did not get +3 binding votes (you got +2 and > > -2, > > > which yields 0). Its not clear from this email whether you're saying > the > > > vote has passed or not. Usually when a vote does not pass, the person > > > initiating the vote sends out a [CANCEL] rather than a [RESULT] (result > > > inherently is treated as a "it passed" email). Cancel makes it clearer > > > that you're withdrawing the vote due to the issues raised. > > > > > > John > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:00 AM Kam Kasravi > > <kamkasr...@yahoo.com.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi John > > >> The vote period has ended and I'm indicating that we will reissue a > new > > >> candidate release package in lieu of the down votes.Do I need to > > explicitly > > >> say 'cancel' the vote? > > >> ThanksKam > > >> > > >> On Sunday, July 17, 2016 7:36 PM, John D. Ament < > > johndam...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> Did you mean to cancel this vote? > > >> On Jul 17, 2016 22:29, "Kam Kasravi" <kamkasr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> The results are in and voting is now closed. > > >>> > > >>> [2] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.1 > > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré (binding) > > >>> Andrew Purtell (binding) > > >>> > > >>> [2] -1 Do not release this package > > >>> Justin Mclean (binding) missing DISCLAIMER and LICENSE problems > > >>> John D. Ament (binding) missing DISCLAIMER > > >>> > > >>> We will correct the noted problems and submit a 0.8.1-RC4. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks > > >>> Kam > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > Craig L Russell > > Architect > > craig.russ...@oracle.com > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
