Hi, > I think these lines for "The Apache License 2.0" for the non-ASF are > misleading (everything else is also Apache License) and is not > required by the Apache license.
While it’s not in line with current policy, it's not a licensing error to list them. Several projects do list them. It may actually useful in some cases as products (i.e. bootstrap and select2) have changed licenses over time. It's also useful for binary files like OpenSans where the license may not be obvious by inspection. > and if they already have a NOTICE None of them (expect Spring Security) have NOTICE files that I can see. The Spring Security NOTICE may not have anything that needs to be propagated. [1] > I would be brave and add their copyright to their files This has come up before on the list (and legal discuss) and the decision was not to add the license/copyright headers. but there’s probably several ways of dealing with this issue. Thanks, Justin 1. https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security/blob/master/notice.txt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
