FWIW, I see the fact that there were some -1s in the vote as a positive thing in ensuring that the concerns behind the -1s will be addressed. I mean that the community will feel a pressure to be inclusive to “prove” that RTC is not an impediment to community growth.
It stands to reason that attention must be paid to ensure that RTC does not negatively effect the community. Harbs On Dec 2, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote: >> ...If the process is 3x+1 and more +1 than -1, this vote passes as Henry >> stated... > > It does pass indeed. > > From a community point of view however, -1s need to be taken into > account and translated into some statement or planned action, that was > my point. > > I'm happy now that this thread has allowed the concerns behind the -1s > to be expressed and commented, I guess this will translate into > reviewing the podling's use of RTC vs. CTR when the time comes to > assert its maturity in view of graduation, in terms of their impact on > the community. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
