On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote: >...
> It's great that Greg and the others who disagree cast their dissenting > votes. That doesn't mean that we should throw out process. If the process > is 3x+1 and more +1 than -1, this vote passes as Henry stated. Greg even > stated (if I understand his statements correctly) that he was not trying to > sink this vote but rather to express his dissent. > Yup, you captured this correctly. > RTC versus CTR is clearly a religious debate. There are a large number of > successful and vibrant Apache communities using each paradigm. I don't > "Apache communities" is (IMO) a very important point here. I believe that Apache communities understand the nuances of peer respect, consensus, and trust. *That* community could weigh the variables and decide which workflow works best for their community. By definition, podling arrivals are not accorded the same self-reliance, and the proposal even states, "fewer have much experience with ASF-based software projects as contributors and community members" Thus, my else-thread suggestion of waiting for an "Apache community" to form, and then making the decision to move from CTR to RTC. >... Cheers, -g
