On 1 December 2015 at 15:22, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >... > > > On 1 December 2015 at 14:46, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >... > > > > Given as we have no actual incubator policy that states whether > > > consensus is required or not - or at least none that I could find - > one > > > would assume this falls back to the default "3x+1 and more +1s than > -1s" > > > here, with consensus being something we strive for, but not a mandatory > > > outcome. > > > > Agreed. That was my interpretation, too. I likely would not have cast a > veto, if that was the interpretation. > > >... > > > > You don't necessarily need to have everyone agree with you, but you > > > should at least have a discussion about your different opinions. > > > > Right. > > >... > > > I understand that Greg does not feel his viewpoint > > has been carried into the proposal for Impala, > > > Oh, I missed the discussion, and only belatedly learned of the RTC and use > of Gerrit within the proposal. I had no preconceptions that the proposal > needed to be altered for [just] me. Only avenue was the vote. >
Ok - thanks for clearing that up! Are you satisfied that there's been enough discussion over RTC vs CTR (which I think is Bertrand's concern)? Are you happy (ok, happy's probably the wrong word) that the [VOTE] has been satisfactorily concluded, and passes, or is there something else you would like us to address? Best, Henry > > Cheers, > -g >
