On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:53PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > So, you're saying that people were chosen to be listed or not as the > > contributors merely by the amount of the code they have contributed to the > > project. Am I reading this right? > > We've had this debate about committer cattle call additions many > times. The position that Todd is taking is completely reasonable. The > expectation that just about anybody can join a project during the > proposal phase is messed up and I wish that tradition had never caught
That's not my point, Marvin. The people who contributed less than 20 commits (hmm, why not 4 or a 107?) are still contributors. And in my opinion, they at least have to be invited to participate in the podling, if it is accepted by IPMC. So, I will re-phrase: "was an invitation to participate in the project extended to all contributors?". Shall it be done formally or by providing "Interested Party" is an implementation detail. Cos > on. Instead, there ought to be an "Interested Party" section in the > proposal template where people can express interest and "subscribe to > your newsletter". >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
