On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: >> ...Sentry started with 24 committers/PPMC. It hasn't added any PPMC members >> since its inception... > > If that's correct I'm -1 on graduating Sentry. > > and earlier he wrote: >> ..The model that Sentry is pursing may work very well *for the existing >> members of the podling.* In my opinion, its process is entirely too >> opaque to allow for interested parties outside of the existing podling >> and companies interested in Sentry development to become involved... > > Not having added any PPMC members seems to confirm that. > > Based on the information provided in this thread It looks to me like > Sentry isn't operating according to items CO20, CO40, CS20 and CS50 of > our maturity model [1].
If this thread is about bringing consensus around the graduation path for Sentry, is there any chance the community/mentors can compile all the data points that are part of the maturity model? This will make it much easier to see things in the holistic view. Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
