On Mon, Nov 2, 2015, at 06:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > > > <snip> > > ... the reply from > > Arvind which basically says he doesn't consider it an issue if the > > project is "following a roadmap the community does not have control > > over... that too is not an issue in my opinion at all." [2] > > > </snip> > > > Joe - I trust and respect you enough to feel that this is unintentional, > but I am being taken out of context. In this and previous emails you have > suggested that I admit and approve of an external entity controlling > Sentry. This is a gross misrepresentation. Please stop implying that for > your future responses as it was not what I said or meant.
I don't think that's *quite* what I suggested, but per Upayavira's note that followed yours, I see I may have misread your message. Upayavira's reading suggests you meant "not an issue" to mean "this is not happening" rather than "I don't consider this a problem." That significantly changes the tone of the response as I understood it. If that was your meaning, I do apologize for misinterpreting what you said. I do appreciate you understanding that my response was based on an honest interpretation of what you wrote. Just to be clear - you're vouching that all of Sentry's development is happening in the open, and Sentry development decisions are not being taken offlist? Thanks much for clarifying! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
