On 10/13/2015 04:37 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ...I want to be sure I can still -1 it without being >> turned into a pariah in the process. =)... > > I don't see a problem with a -1 when voting to accept a podling. > > As those are majority votes that wouldn't be a veto, but if a suitable > justification is provided people should pay attention to it.
Minor nit: If suitable justification is provided, people MUST pay attention to it. We have a clear rule in the policy that if someone wants to put a vote on hold, it must happen: "If any Incubator PMC member says "hold" before the 72 hours [voting period] are up, a formal discussion/vote will be conducted. " On a related note; Am I correct in interpreting the rules such that graduation requires consensus, and thus -1 would be a veto? With regards, Daniel. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
