> On 16 Apr 2015, at 09:32, Seetharam Venkatesh <venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > > @David, I have uploaded the source tar ball for your review at > http://people.apache.org/~venkatesh/atlas/ while I work on making the > repository public. > > Thanks! >
venkatesh -how about creating your own personal repo, adding it to the list of repos for the project and publishing it that way? > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <jus...@erenkrantz.com> >> wrote: >> >>> It's extremely hard to come to Apache when you have a vague idea and no >>> code. >>> >>> The Incubator is simply too high a bar for folks who just want to play >>> with an idea and aren't sure where it is heading. >>> >>> So, I wouldn't hold it against people - turn it on ourselves - how can >>> we create a process to facilitate people who aren't ready yet? >>> >>> FWIW, my opinion from last night is that is exactly what GitHub is >>> for. (Apache Labs was that place at one time, but it's only for >>> members - not external folks.) Once you have that rough consensus and >>> running code and have a fledgling community of stakeholders, then it's >>> time to bring it to Apache via the Incubator. To be fair, there were >>> others who disagreed; but, the rough consensus (ha!) was that the >>> Incubator hasn't yet cracked that model. >>> >> >> >> Well, the case of non-vague idea and little or no code is exemplified by >> Apache Drill which has turned out pretty well. Good releases, good code, >> needs more diversity still. But a good project that worked very well in >> incubation. >> >> Your end-point of vague idea is a different case and I agree with you >> there. >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Venkatesh > > “Perfection (in design) is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, > but rather when there is nothing more to take away.” > - Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
