Please go ahead - apologies for not doing it myself I have access problems on the incubator wiki.
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation -----Original Message----- From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 9:22 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.) Anyone mind then if i put strawman up on the wiki? On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 12:11:42 PM Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 14, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > at this point we have had a few lively threads discussing three > > somewhat different proposals: > > #1 mentor re-boot > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MentorRebootProposal < > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MentorRebootProposal> > > > #2 pTLP > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2 <http://wiki.apache.org/ > incubator/IncubatorV2> > > > #3 Ross's strawman http://s.apache.org/8eS it feels to me that all > > three need additional work to be done before we can have any > > reasonable consensus around them (let alone voting). > > > > Wearing my chair hat, I would like to suggest that the next step > > should be: for each proposal we identify points that are going to > > block consensus (AKA would result in -1 vote if it comes to a vote). > > I suggest we do it on the wiki pages themselves (I'll wikify Ross's > > proposal tonight). Not editing the wikis but simply collecting this > > feedback as the last section in each proposal. The idea would be to > > identify all such points in a week or so. > > > > Sounds good? > > Thanks for picking this up. > > Does it make sense to make a matrix to compare them? I’m happy to > take a crack at it. Could you field offline questions about #2 for me? > > > Regards, > Alan > >
