Well, David, I'm afraid you are the authoritative source on the policy you use 
as an example. If it's not documented and that's a problem then it's *your* 
problem. You could (given even more time to volunteer to the ASF, solve it 
however you like (e.g. Write the doc, ask the community to write it, ask for 
budget to have a contract write it, something else), but it's you and the infra 
team that own this.

I hope you won't take this personally, its not meant that way. As a volunteer 
you do a fantastic job and we are all immensely grateful. However, you did feed 
me a perfect way to illustrate the point I've been trying to make when 
highlighting docs and saying "patches welcome".

Perhaps it is time we hired a contractor to draw up the one document of truth?

I'm working on the 2015 budget now. Any volunteers to own this? Ownership is 
ensuring that the individual gets access to all the appropriate VPs and that 
those VPs are able to provide the necessary input.

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: David Nalley<mailto:da...@gnsa.us>
Sent: ‎1/‎13/‎2015 7:45 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org<mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: What is "The Apache Way"?

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Doug Cutting <cutt...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> 
> wrote:
>> I think a better analogy would be "US Culture". Yes it is as nebulous
>> as it gets, but the fact that US Constitution exists as a written document
>> makes a LOT of things WAY easier.
>
> Apache's constitution is the corporate bylaws:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html
>
> US Culture is stuff like Starbucks, Elvis, Manifest Destiny, etc.
> Most of that is not coded as law, thankfully.
>

Except that there generally aren't authority figures to whom I am
answerable to telling me I am doing it wrong if I don't drink Pumpkin
Spice Latte's while listening to Blue Suede Shoes.

Going back to a conversation from the middle of last year as an
example, there is no documented expectation (unless you consider
Shane's recently created page authoritative) that the canonical source
code repository must live on ASF hardware. Which is fine, we all know
the reason why, but when newcomers show up, they don't, and it seems
like we are a mass of unwritten rules that MUST be followed.


--David

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to