Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 9, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jan 9, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 01/09/2015 02:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Another way to look at the Apache Way is as a musical composition.
>>> Sure, it was written for a specific arrangement, but sometimes
>>> it's played as a jazz piece, other-times as a classical, or maybe
>>> with a blues flavor. But it is always (or*should be*) recognizable.
>>> If you*don't*  recognize it, then you've taken the "interpretation"
>>> too far, if you get my meaning.
>> 
>> What a delightful analogy.
>> 
>> Of course, you're always going to get people who say that a disco rendition 
>> is fine, and others who say it's blasphemous.
> 
>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ouMaLRth-s
> 
> "blasphemous"? Maybe. Recognizable? Yeah (fortunately or not) :)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to