> On Jan 10, 2015, at 3:04 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > >> On 01/09/2015 02:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> Another way to look at the Apache Way is as a musical composition. >>> Sure, it was written for a specific arrangement, but sometimes >>> it's played as a jazz piece, other-times as a classical, or maybe >>> with a blues flavor. But it is always (or*should be*) recognizable. >>> If you*don't* recognize it, then you've taken the "interpretation" >>> too far, if you get my meaning. >> >> What a delightful analogy. >> >> Of course, you're always going to get people who say that a disco >> rendition is fine, and others who say it's blasphemous. > > From my perspective, that explanation of The Apache Way was fine, but > completely unhelpful. >
Numerous people have provided numerous write-ups of the basic goals of the Apache Way. That didn't help (I guess). I attempted to provide the underlying rationale behind those goals of the Apache Way. "Completely unhelpful". Considering that both detailed answers as well and more "philosophical" answers don't satisfy, I am at a loss to what approach to try next. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
