On Jan 5, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > I'm resending Alan's proposal with a new subject as I think it > deserves more attention. > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: >> ...Podlings would be required to have a minimum of two active mentors. A >> mentor is free to become inactive >> but must explicitly state this else the mentor risks being removed for not >> performing their duties. Podlings that >> do not have the minimum of two active mentors are put on hold until they >> find enough mentors to fill the quota. >> Being put on hold means that no committers can be added, no PPMC members can >> be added, and no >> releases can be performed. It does not stop development... > > I like it very much...it's a small, reversible step that puts the > burden on podlings and mentors, which are the ones who should be > concerned about podlings going forward. > > It's also consistent with podlings having to find mentors to join the > Incubator - they just have to keep on making sure their mentors are > active, or ask for new ones when needed. > > As for measuring the mentors activity, I suggest simply adding a > question to the podling reports, "who are your two active mentors and > are you happy with their activity" along with requiring report > sign-off from those two mentors. Thanks Bertrand. It’s a snippet of what I sent out over a year or so ago. I’ll resend it. Regards, Alan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
