On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > ...What's difficult is the part > that would require us to do something with poddlings put > on hold. Unless we come up with clear exit criteria for > this new state -- I don't think we're solving any real problems > here....
A podling that's on hold is not adding committers nor making releases, so they cannot make progress towards graduation. They can then be managed in the same way as non-progressing podlings: fail them if that state persists for too long. That's a minimal change from how we're operating now. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
