On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: >> IMO, it doesn’t matter so long as the original vote to accept the proposal >> includes the entire proposal. > > It would be inconvenient if people don't use the wiki or some other form where > the evolution of the proposal can be inspected using diffs. Close reading of > proposal text is costly; serious flaws can hide in small crevices. We don't > want those weighing a proposal to have to perform careful review a second time > for the VOTE thread.
Huge +1 to this consideration. The way it works for me: when anybody is asking me to do work for that person (read proposal, formulate opinion, vote) the easiest way to get that work done is to make it *easier* for *me* to do it. You don't have to, of course. Just like I don't *have* to vote on every single proposal. May be I'm in the minority, but tracking proposal evolution on a wiki-like medium makes it easier for me. The call, of course, belongs to the one who actually wants the proposal to be accepted. Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
