Hi, > As a mentor I've (nearly) always advised that if there are three IPMC votes > on the dev list then there is no need to make further noise on the general > list with unnecessary +1's. I therefore point out in the general@ vote mail > that 3 binding (IPMC) +1's have been received and therefore there is only a > need to vote if there is an objection. Fair enough + seem reasonable to me.
> TECHNICALITY: PPMC votes are not binding (although they absolutely should be > considered as such by the project). Only IPMC votes are considered binding at > the foundational level since PPMC members are not yet a member of a formal > committee. You need 3 +1 votes first on the podlings dev list, and PPMC votes do count there, we wouldn't see a lot of podling releases otherwise. :-) Does that mean any +1 vote (say by a committer or user) on the dev list also counts if PPMC votes aren't actually considered binding? (I'd assume not but again it's not clear from the document). Thanks, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
