We are not talking about "piling on" for Pete's sake. We are talking about 2-3 people who expressed an interest in becoming initial committers. Are you saying that even if those 2-3 people were complete deadwood that the other committers and especially the Mentors would be so overwhelmed by such a "massive" piling-on that the podling would be so hamstrung?
In any case, whatever. On Sep 25, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > >> Alex, you are constantly mixing up expectations of PMCs >> and podlings. Plus, since the ASF did not watch how Usergrid >> was handled when it was external, we (the ASF) has no idea >> how "meritocratic" it was... in fact, and I'm sorry to say >> this, the viciousness of all this leads me to wonder just >> what counted as "merit". >> >> Your definition of what is "better" does not align with >> everyones, nor does it align with the experience of >> other successful podlings. > > > My views on this matter are 1:1 with the 2006 post on "pilling on". It's > that simple. If I'm mixing things up please let me know how. > > Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
