On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: > For me the social norm *should* be to allow things to progress > unhindered unless an action is non-reversible and potentially damaging > to the community.
No. That's not acceptable to me as an IPMC member. VOTEs are tied to specific language. Trivial conveniences do not justify corrupting the fundamental voting mechanism. > If people want to adopt the inefficient process then fair enough, > someone inform me they will veto the vote unless we revert the change. > I'll comply with the rules if someone wants to insist. But this is a > discussion and I believe it's a waste of time. So long no one contends that this sets a precedent, I would prefer that we let things slide this time. Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
