I respectfully suggest your intervention is an example of ISSUE 03 (too many cooks). As a champion I'm interested in podlings learning the Apache Way - a significant part of this is to not let unnecessary process get in the way of software development.
The vote is still open and can be stopped with a veto. This is a reversible step. It is done in full view of the voting community. No harm is done and a little extra work for a number of volunteers is avoided. Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity On 18 Jun 2013 03:18, "Marvin Humphrey" <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Ross Gardler > <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: > > C'mon Marvin. The project has enough ASF committers on the initial > > commiter list (ignoring mentors) to be able to conduct a committer > > vote. > > > > Lets not add unnecessary bureaucracy during the initial set-up phase. > > Voting in a new committer isn't a lot of work, and Stratos has a lot of > resources behind it. Following the rules wouldn't have been a big deal. > > I'm not prepared to blow up the Incubator over this issue, though -- only > to > ask nicely. > > If Stratos later experiences frustration regarding the Incubator's > conflicting > rules and inconsistent enforcement of rules, now they'll know where that > comes > from. > > Marvin Humphrey > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
