I wonder: would the Hive community be willing to take an active role in supervising the work of the hcatalog people with an eye toward reaching the conclusion that they could be accepted as committers en bloc?
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org >> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >> <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: >> > ...I'm -1 on this graduation... >> >> -1 from me as well, I agree with Chris' points. >> >> > Yes these were good points however I don't think the HCatalog community has > enough critical mass for a TLP at this point in time. I think this and the > overwhelming dependencies on Hive made the community favor merging under > the Hive TLP. I can understand both points of view coming from Chris and > from Alan. > > >> This looks either like an umbrella project (which we don't want >> anymore) or a PMC not trusting its committers. >> >> IMO the options are either graduating Hive as a TLP (assuming the >> > > Bertrand I am presuming you meant HCatalog as a TLP here ... > > >> podling is in good standing for that to happen), or having Hive adopt >> the HCatalog code *and its committers*. >> >> > It is unfortunate that the Hive TLP does not trust the HCatalog community > enough to merge the two. However if we're looking at a new TLP for HCatalog > I think we're going to have to continue trying to build community a bit > longer. > > -- > Best Regards, > -- Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
