On 29 November 2012 14:59, Alan Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 29, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Alan Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> > wrote: > >> ... Would you also add the three or more active PMC members > requirement? What constitutes active?... > > > > IMO the bare minimum is being able to find three PMC members to vote > > on things when needed. > > > > Once a project gets below this limit it's in trouble and usually > > headed for the attic, but that's not the only possibility - see > > "Resolution to reboot the Apache Xalan PMC" at > > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2011/board_minutes_2011_07_20.txt > > for example. > > And so by extension we can apply this to podlings as well. > > So if the IP is vetted and we trust the PPMC members then the podling has > met all the requirements for incubation? > > > +1 > > -- > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > Programme Leader (Open Development) > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >
