+1 (non-binding) Is there precedent on releasing with less than three +1s from IPMC members if there are no 0s or -1s from anyone at all? The minimum required 72 hours have also passed.
We'd really like to establish a frequent release cycle, Bloodhound 0.3 is already ready to be packaged up as soon as 0.2 has been released. Thanks, Joe On 31 October 2012 21:49, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Joachim Dreimann > <joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com> wrote: > > The result of the vote is summarised here: > > http://markmail.org/thread/zrgkleendiqvanzs > > This message didn't include an IPMC tally, but I see that Mentor Branko > Čibej > voted on the bloodhound-dev thread. That makes one IPMC member voting +1; > two > more are needed. > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Less than a day left... any takers? > > Marvin Humphrey > -- Joe Dreimann UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/> * * *Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> *
