On 11/5/12, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Joachim Dreimann
> <joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Is there precedent on releasing with less than three +1s from IPMC
>> members
>> if there are no 0s or -1s from anyone at all?
>
> Sorry, no.

:'(

>> We'd really like to establish a frequent release cycle, Bloodhound 0.3 is
>> already ready to be packaged up as soon as 0.2 has been released.
>
> That may be challenging.
>
[...]
>
> What I might suggest in general is doing things to get the code base
> squeaky
> clean and plainly so.
>
> *   Make sure that the release passes RAT.
> *   In fact, set up a buildbot to run RAT on a regular basis.

Already discussed [1]_ [2]_ [3]_ . Numbers may be tricky . Most of the
Unknown/Unlicensed files are those found in the (patched) copy of trac
we keep in the repository . I'm not sure of whether we should ignore
them . I don't know if anything new has been done about that either
... but we definitely should not have so many files (547 ?) in
conflict .

[...]
>
> *   Script your release process and integrate legal checks into it.
>

yes , that's a good point
;)

.. [1] RE: RAT builds
   
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-bloodhound-dev/201208.mbox/%3C006101cd7617$a52e4210$ef8ac630$@16degrees.com.au%3E)

.. [2] Rat Report
   (http://ci.apache.org/projects/bloodhound/rat-output.html)

.. [3] RAT Reports summaries for participating projects
   (http://ci.apache.org/projects/rat-master-summary.html)


-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to