All, Would device data licensed under the Mozilla Public License be compatible with the aims of this Proposal? If so you may wish to evaluate http://51degrees.mobi which provides device data under the Mozilla Public License in addition to a premium paid for data set. Both the free and premium data set is already integrated into the Apache Mobile Filter (http://fiftyone.apachemobilefilter.org/). A clean sheet was used when creating this solution avoiding the possible issues referred to in earlier posts.
You should also consider the matching approach you'll be using early in the design stage as this is linked to the device data being used and the methods used to maintain the device data. 51Degrees.mobi includes matching logic in the data set. Regards, James Rosewell - 51Degrees.mobi Founder and CEO -----Original Message----- From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:and...@objectstyle.org] Sent: 23 December 2011 17:41 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeviceMap, a data repository and APIs for mobile device information Thanks. That answers it actually :-) On Dec 23, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: >> The question is essentially about any existing assets the project is planning to bring to Apache. While any answer to that is unlikely to disqualify the proposal, it may lead to licensing questions, process questions, etc. So while this is curiosity of sorts, I think it is an important thing to understand. > > Ok, I see your point and agree - but keep in mind that we're not > intially planning to adopt any OpenDDR *data* - as I said, doing that > or not requires more discussion once the podling starts. > > -Bertrand > > > >> On Dec 23, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Dec 23, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>>> >>>>> Note that the proposal mentions OpenDDR donating their *source >>>>> code* only - as mentioned in the proposal, the "details" of the >>>>> repository data will be discussed once the podling starts. >>>> >>>> The repository is the most valuable piece here. So I think it is important to discuss this aspect here now. Appreciate the proposal authors commenting on it.... >>> >>> I agree that the format and contents of the DeviceMap data >>> repository require serious discussions: which sources of data to >>> use, which >>> format(s) to use to store and to publish the data, how to trace data >>> provenance where needed, etc. >>> >>> However, all this is IMO out of scope of the "do we agree for >>> DeviceMap podling to enter incubation" discussion that we're having >>> now. So, if you're asking out of curiosity I'm fine, but if you >>> think the acceptance of the podling should be based on this >>> discussion about the data repository "details", I disagree. >>> >>> -Bertrand >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
