On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: > > On Dec 23, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >> Note that the proposal mentions OpenDDR donating their *source code* >> only - as mentioned in the proposal, the "details" of the repository >> data will be discussed once the podling starts. > > The repository is the most valuable piece here. So I think it is important to > discuss this aspect here now. Appreciate the proposal authors commenting on > it....
I agree that the format and contents of the DeviceMap data repository require serious discussions: which sources of data to use, which format(s) to use to store and to publish the data, how to trace data provenance where needed, etc. However, all this is IMO out of scope of the "do we agree for DeviceMap podling to enter incubation" discussion that we're having now. So, if you're asking out of curiosity I'm fine, but if you think the acceptance of the podling should be based on this discussion about the data repository "details", I disagree. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
