Personally I am against the idea of picking a chair for a podling early. It would have been a terrible idea for thrift for instance, where a proper chair only emerged after over a year of incubation. Had it picked a chair early, it would undoubtedly not have been that person, but some Facebook person, in which case the project may not have ever graduated because of the all-too-common initial misperception that the chair holdsa position of authority over the project.
----- Original Message ----- > From: Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:42 AM > Subject: Re: should podlings have informal chairs? > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:38 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Currently it reads: >> >> "drive the process of incubation forwards which finally leads to an >> acceptance vote" >> >> The problem is that "process of incubation" can mean more than > just >> entering the Incubator, and "acceptance" could refer to > graduation. >> >> How about: >> >> "drive the process of entering the Incubator, leading to a vote to >> accept the proposed podling" >> >> Not perfect, but also not ambiguous, I hope? > > Your version reads better imho > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
