Kalle Korhonen wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin > <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> But yes, I agree that using "kill search" is probably a bad idea. > >> What podlings needs to do is essentially "fact finding" (not > >> interpretation). Perhaps someone could come up with something along > >> this line of thinking... > > "Podling Name Filter"...? > > "Podling Name Hunt"...? > > "Podling Name Elimination"...? > > "That Trademark Stuff Podlings Need To Do"...? > >> (Or someone could just suggest a cool name) > > Ideas? > > Not sure this action item needs to have a single, well-defined name, > but I think you are approaching it from the wrong angle. Instead of > eliminating, the projects need to do something like "name availability > search", or even "confirming availability of a trademark", although > it's difficult to get a 100% confirmation. It should be enough just to > verify the availability "to the best of your ability" using common, > best-practice guidance.
I was wondering along these lines too. Make up our own term from a positive angle. "Suitable Names Search" In the last few days i have also been investigating our Guidelines documentation. There does not seem to be much assistance for this task. I have commenced some additions. -David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
