On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin >> <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin >>> <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Opinions? Objections? Improvements? Comments? >>> >>> <silence/> >> >> Just one comment: the "kill search" term sounds odd to me. Where did >> it come from? To me it suggests something a crazy hunter would do when >> looking for prey to kill. > > (I suspect this might be an example of lawyer humour) > > The idea is to kill bad names early (fail fast) before expensive legal > advice is sort > >> Wouldn't something like "trademark search" be more to the point? > > AIUI "trademark search" is an overloaded technical legal term. In some > cases, the board may need to actually pay for an actual "trademark > search". This would get confusing for everyone. > > But yes, I agree that using "kill search" is probably a bad idea. > What podlings needs to do is essentially "fact finding" (not > interpretation). Perhaps someone could come up with something along > this line of thinking...
"Podling Name Filter"...? "Podling Name Hunt"...? "Podling Name Elimination"...? "That Trademark Stuff Podlings Need To Do"...? > (Or someone could just suggest a cool name) Ideas? Robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
