On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin >> <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Opinions? Objections? Improvements? Comments? >> >> <silence/> > > Just one comment: the "kill search" term sounds odd to me. Where did > it come from? To me it suggests something a crazy hunter would do when > looking for prey to kill.
(I suspect this might be an example of lawyer humour) The idea is to kill bad names early (fail fast) before expensive legal advice is sort > Wouldn't something like "trademark search" be more to the point? AIUI "trademark search" is an overloaded technical legal term. In some cases, the board may need to actually pay for an actual "trademark search". This would get confusing for everyone. But yes, I agree that using "kill search" is probably a bad idea. What podlings needs to do is essentially "fact finding" (not interpretation). Perhaps someone could come up with something along this line of thinking... (Or someone could just suggest a cool name) Robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
