+1, although I'd rather see it go in the "dormant" section. Also, I would have rather see this vote happen on stonehenge-dev first, but it's not that big of a deal.
-- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > > The Stonehenge project pretty much accomplished what it originally set out to > do and then really didn't find a way to transition to something that is longer > lasting and able to develop a community around it. Lately, there has been > no interest in it as evidence by the last commit being almost a year ago. The > only recent activity on the dev list is about retiring it and notices about > missing board reports. > > Please vote for the retiring of the Stonehenge podling: > > [] +1 - please retire > [] +/-0 > [] -1 - please don't retire, because... > > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend - http://www.talend.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
