On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:50:56 AM Henri Yandell wrote:
>> +1 (non-binding).
>>
>> Additionally the source should imo be deleted from SVN as the podling
>> didn't sign off on their copyright due diligence (or we should get
>> that signed off on before shutdown).
>
> Stonehenge did do a release at one point (July 2010) so that should have been
> taken care of.

Should have :)

Before retiring we should investigate and get the two copyright items
closed out.

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to