+1 (non-binding). Additionally the source should imo be deleted from SVN as the podling didn't sign off on their copyright due diligence (or we should get that signed off on before shutdown).
Hen On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 - please retire > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> The Stonehenge project pretty much accomplished what it originally set out to >> do and then really didn't find a way to transition to something that is >> longer >> lasting and able to develop a community around it. Lately, there has been >> no interest in it as evidence by the last commit being almost a year ago. >> The >> only recent activity on the dev list is about retiring it and notices about >> missing board reports. >> >> Please vote for the retiring of the Stonehenge podling: >> >> [] +1 - please retire >> [] +/-0 >> [] -1 - please don't retire, because... >> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Kulp >> dk...@apache.org >> http://dankulp.com/blog >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
