Hi again,
As you already noticed, the main Issue is INFRA-3597[1].
Many thanks in advance!
Simo

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3597

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> the discussion in following up on INFRA-3601[1], please join to
> correct me if I'm wrong!
> Many thanks in advance,
> Simo
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3601
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> just for the record (for the new contributors). As long as your incubating 
>> the following rules apply:
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
>>
>> At the time you graduate you need to check who really was active and 
>> 'cleanup' the PPMC. So not every person which was on the PPMC automatically 
>> makes it to the final PMC anyway ...
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>> --- On Mon, 5/2/11, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: OGNL Infrastructure questions
>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>> Date: Monday, May 2, 2011, 7:11 AM
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/5/2 Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>:
>>> >> My issue (for the commons PMC I guess) is how
>>> committer votes will
>>> >> happen when OGNL graduates.
>>> >>
>>> >> After graduation, how would one of the current
>>> contributors propose a
>>> >> new committer if they are not themselves on the
>>> Commons PMC?
>>> >
>>> > Proposal:
>>> >
>>> > - If you are a Commons PMC Member, you are an OGNL
>>> PPMC member by default
>>> > - If a Committer is invited to the PPMC, an additional
>>> vote on Commons
>>> > PMC is necessary, b/c he will join the Commons PMC
>>> after graduation by
>>> > default
>>> > - A contributor can be proposed by anybody - its up to
>>> the PPMC to open the vote
>>> > - A new Committer can be elected by the PPMC with
>>> binding votes; as
>>> > usual other Committers can vote unbinding. I don't
>>> think it creates
>>> > any problems b/c usually there is already a consens on
>>> adding a person
>>> > before calling a vote.
>>> >
>>> > Makes sense?
>>> >
>>> > Cheers
>>> > Christian
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Upayavira
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun, 01 May 2011 19:56 +0200, "Simone Tripodi"
>>> >> <simonetrip...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> Hi Upayavira!!!
>>> >>> I agree that commons folks can have rw rights,
>>> so people are already
>>> >>> used to co-work in the 'commons way'.
>>> >>> Moreover, I agreed on joining
>>> >>>
>>> >>> - dev@commons.a.o
>>> >>> - users@commons.a.o
>>> >>> - issues@commons.a.o
>>> >>> - create the private ML where commons PMCs can
>>> join.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Does it make sense?
>>> >>> Simo
>>> >>>
>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> >>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Upayavira
>>> <u...@odoko.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> > use commons-user: +1
>>> >>> > put SVN in 'incubator' space: +1
>>> >>> > grant "commons rw: +1 (assuming current
>>> OGNL committers agree)
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > As to a private list, I think the benefit
>>> would be the opportunity for
>>> >>> > the OGNL committers to learn how such
>>> management happens. Where, for
>>> >>> > example, would committer votes happen?
>>> The issue with graduation to
>>> >>> > Commons is what happens after graduation
>>> - do they suddenly loose some
>>> >>> > power over their own affairs, e.g. ease
>>> of seeing vote threads. So not
>>> >>> > sure the best on this one.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Upayavira
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:29 -0700, "Henri
>>> Yandell" <flame...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> > wrote:
>>> >>> >> Agreed, no need to use the svn
>>> location from Commons; though I ask to
>>> >>> >> allow @commons rw access.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> The committer of the podling would
>>> not automatically become PMC
>>> >>> >> members, so I don't think there is a
>>> need to setup a private list (or
>>> >>> >> even to consider it a PPMC).
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> Hen
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:05 PM,
>>> Christian Grobmeier
>>> >>> >> <grobme...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >> we could share MLs and also
>>> SVN (Sandbox
>>> >>> >> >> would be nice, not?)
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > MLs are fine, b/c one would need
>>> to change address later, and
>>> >>> >> > searching for pre-graduation
>>> threads is more easily.
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > For SVN I don't see a benefit.
>>> The repos can be moved with less effort
>>> >>> >> > once component is graduated. I
>>> would like to avoid to get something
>>> >>> >> > into the sandbox which is not
>>> cleared from legal perspective. What, if
>>> >>> >> > OGNL fails in the incubator and
>>> we just forget to remove the code from
>>> >>> >> > the sandbox? If its in the
>>> incubator part, it is like a tag
>>> >>> >> > saying:"beware"
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > I would be +1 on user/dev ML but
>>> leave SVN in incubator
>>> >>> >> > Is there a need to create a pmc
>>> ML for OGNL to discuss incubation
>>> >>> >> > related matters?
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > Cheers
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >> What Incubator PMCs think
>>> about it?
>>> >>> >> >> Simo
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> >>> >> >> http://www.99soft.org/
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:34
>>> AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>> Below is a thread from
>>> the Commons Dev list in which I'm recommending
>>> >>> >> >>> that OGNL use the
>>> commons dev mailing list and that the svn
>>> >>> >> >>> permissions allow the
>>> ognl committers and the commons committers to
>>> >>> >> >>> have read write access.
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >>> >> >>>    http://commons.markmail.org/thread/ku3ouuilpiicb5is
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >>> >> >>> Is this a concern for
>>> anyone?
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >>> >> >>> OGNL's target is to
>>> graduate into Commons rather than to TLP, so
>>> >>> >> >>> making it act like a TLP
>>> seems destined to cause problems.
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >>> >> >>> Hen
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>> >> >>> For additional commands,
>>> e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>> >> >> For additional commands,
>>> e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > --
>>> >>> >> > http://www.grobmeier.de
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > http://www.grobmeier.de
>>> >
>>> >
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Olivier Lamy
>>> http://twitter.com/olamy
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to